Reskilling for Relevance: The New Core Skills of the Orchestrated Workforce

When an AI agent gets an email address and a spot on the org chart, it forces a question most organizations aren't ready to answer: who's accountable when things go wrong, and what does responsible oversight look like in practice?

A recent LinkedIn post about McKinsey giving AI agents employee IDs and email addresses crystallized this tension perfectly, and it's hitting a nerve because it exposes a reality we're not prepared for: the workforce now requires an entirely new set of skills. And the shift is happening faster than our norms, policies, and training can keep up. 

When leaders get this right, they can tap into today's messy labor landscape to leverage a workforce designed for coherence, capacity, and accountability, without trading away human growth or trust.

The Messy Labor Landscape Right Now

[[blue-box]]For AI to become digital labor, it needs to be designed, governed, and coached by humans who now need new core skills to do this effectively.[[/blue-box]]

For decades, automation lived on the factory floor, where repetition and precision were king. But around 2022, automation climbed the corporate ladder. AI began reshaping knowledge work in ways we'd only been allowed to imagine. The shift from physical to cognitive automation has transformed the labor landscape, creating a hybrid workforce with radically different skills and capabilities.

We're no longer managing just humans. With AI agents and digital workers now woven into teams, we're greeting what organizational psychology calls a sociotechnical system, a complex network of humans, technology, workflows, authority, accountability, shared context, and incentives all operating together.

The current narrative frames our struggles as an AI failure. It's not. It’s a human and digital labor coordination failure. Because we're inside the earliest stages of AI-enabled work, we lack clear roles, ownership structures, and management frameworks for digital workers. For human workers there’s a lack of clarity on the new skills they need to thrive in this agentic era.

Beneath the anxiety and confusion, the hybrid labor market is demanding something specific: the coordination mechanisms that deliver on the promise of work, more capacity, not fewer humans. For complex sociotechnical systems to function well inside organizations, coordination must be intentional, designed, and supported by systematic reskilling.

What Changes in a Hybrid Labor System

When digital workers join the org chart, the fundamental mechanics of work shift. It's no longer just about managing people; it's about orchestrating a system where humans and digital workers have clear roles, shared context, and coordination mechanisms to function together.

Comments from the LinkedIn thread raise very legitimate concerns: accountability ambiguity, governance lag, skill atrophy, superficial productivity, trust erosion, and pilots that collapse at scale. These are predictable outcomes that stem from a dangerous assumption: that the AI marketplace represents an already-solved future of work. It doesn't. The agents exist, but the coordination mechanisms, oversight structures, and role clarity organizations need? Those require intentional design. We're not at the destination; we're still drawing the map. And drawing that map requires clarity on three labor shifts:

1. The nature of human work shifts. Employees move from execution to coordination, from doing repetitive tasks to managing digital workers who handle them. The work transforms into oversight, validation, and strategic direction.
2. The leadership mandate expands. Leaders are no longer just managing people; they're designing their organization's sociotechnical system. The job becomes defining which work belongs to whom, how accountability flows, and where humans maintain strategic control.
3. Coordination becomes non-negotiable. In a system with multiple types of workers, coordination determines whether the system amplifies capacity or creates chaos. Who decides what? Who supervises execution? How do we ensure AI doesn't make strategic decisions without appropriate human oversight?

These shifts are foundational. What separates organizations that thrive from those that stumble is how intentionally they design for them.

Design Your Workforce for Coherence

[[blue-box]]

In 2020, employees were hired for what they could do; in 2026, they’re hired for how well they can coordinate what gets done.

[[/blue-box]]

‍

Coherence in a hybrid workforce means humans and digital workers operate as a coordinated system with clear roles, accountability structures, and shared context. It's not about deploying digital workers and hoping they integrate smoothly. It's about designing the conditions that let both types of workers amplify each other's strengths without creating governance gaps, coordination failures, or strategic drift.

Workforce design rests on four foundational elements:

1. Define clear ownership of the context layer. AI can execute, but it can't define what good looks like, which edge cases matter, or how outputs connect to strategy. That's human territory. Employees need to own the workflows, decision frameworks, and quality standards that digital workers operate within. This means investing in work design literacy: deconstructing work, coordinating human-digital worker workflows, and maintaining judgment over what work belongs to whom.
2. Build oversight structures. Digital workers need supervision just like human employees do. Clear accountability structures need to define who reviews output, who validates accuracy, and who catches when AI drifts off-strategy. And oversight structures must be designed to scale. Without these mechanisms, governance breaks down. Leaders need to design feedback loops, escalation paths, and quality checkpoints that keep humans engaged in validation and continuous improvement.
3. Reskill for usage and coordination. Employees need output validation skills, data literacy, ethical reasoning, and according to McKinsey, AI adoption and AI domain transformation in addition to AI fluency or AI literacy skills. And while not an exhaustive list, each of these are becoming part of the new core competencies that let employees supervise digital teammates effectively, enable coordination, maintain accountability for outcomes, and help to protect against skill atrophy. Platforms like Trailhead offer starting points for building foundational AI fluency and agentic AI skills at scale.
4. Anchor humans in strategic, judgment-heavy work. The whole point of a hybrid workforce is to free humans from repetitive execution so they can focus on creativity, relationship-building, and complex problem-solving. But that only happens if you intentionally design roles in this way. The risk is mistaking speed for effectiveness, onboarding digital workers that produce work faster without producing better outcomes, or worse, eroding the trust employees and customers place in human judgment. Leaders need to audit where human time is going and actively shift routine, scalable work to digital workers to elevate the work that humans get to work on.

Every major workforce study from the past year confirms the same finding: the gap between AI capability and human readiness is widening. Reskilling is the mechanism that keeps humans as accountable architects of work rather than passive consumers of AI output. The question for every leader is whether they'll invest in that readiness before the gap becomes unbridgeable.

The organizations that succeed in this transition will be the ones that treat workforce design as a strategic discipline, one that requires clear coordination mechanisms, intentional skill development, and a commitment to keeping humans at the center of judgment, accountability, and growth. 

Ready to turn your hybrid workforce into a strategic advantage? Our Digital Labor Advisory helps you design the coordination, governance, and skill systems that make it work. [Talk to an advisor]